manic pixie dream boys and girls who wear glasses: thoughts on Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewaani
[Written communication and I are not getting along very well this weekend, so I am surrendering and making a list instead of struggling with paragraphs and transitions and proper writerly things like that.]
[Vaguely spoiler-y, but it's a mainstream Hindi romance, so really, you already know.]
[Vaguely spoiler-y, but it's a mainstream Hindi romance, so really, you already know.]
- Is there anything as lovely and wonderful as being told someone values and likes you just the way you are? I think not. It is the best thing.
- Related: it is bittersweet as an audience member to witness what feels like a real-ish, if brief and fleeting, conversation that acknowledges that loving each other may not be enough for a successful relationship if you want different things out of life or are in different stages or versions of maturity or self-awareness.
- Recognition that someone can be quiet and reserved but still brave and silly is very refreshing. Similarly, while we see it more often than we do the former, I think, it is very nice to give the smooth and flitty person some intellectual and emotional depth.
- Film philosophy breakthrough: you can be an academically talented woman who wears glasses and keep both them and your career through the whole movie while still getting a romantically happy ending! It does help to look like Deepika Padukone, to have worn short skirts with bare legs from the get-go, and to have your glasses off in key scenes, but still.
- Seriously what is with the way these people packed for a Himalayan trek? There must have been a Tardis on that donkey to fit all the zillions of coats and booty shorts.
- Deepika is growing on me as an actor. This might be the best thing I've seen her do?
- The character of Lara—hot, dumb, and infantile—feels like an exploitation trick (or gambit, to be generous) of including something mockable in order to get the double payoff of both titillating by showing it and earning brownie points for critiquing it. Maybe she's there as a signifier of the not-fully-matured mind of the hero in his 20s, but she did not sit well in a film that I otherwise found to be more thoughtful and subtle than I was expecting.
- Beware the Beard of NRI Discontent: Ranbir's Parisian facial hair is seriously awful, but it suits the sense of "something is not quite right" when he is most disconnected from heart and metaphorical home.
- Just as I was tiring of 20something silliness, Ranbir's character showed some depth. And just as I was tiring of 20something everything, the movie leapt forward to 30somethingness.
- Immediately expressing selfish, sort-sighted, and ignorant opinions about your friend's good news makes you a bad friend. It's not your fault you didn't know he wanted to go to journalism school, but the thing to do if you're surprised is express just that, not criticize him and imply he's the new poster boy for the death of good times. (And if Northwestern University sends official paperwork in colored envelopes, those envelopes would surely be purple, not blue.)
- What a pleasure it is to have seen Farooq Shaikh triumph in three different roles within a year (Shanghai, Listen Amaya). I spent the last 15 minutes of the movie quietly crying under the combined effect of Ranbir's regretful face, Farooq's paternal love, and Tanvi Azmi's bridge to what had not been understood.
- What is going to happen to this couple long-term? One of them says something to the effect of "Marriage isn't trying. Once you're in it, you're in it," which runs exactly contrary to everything every happily married couple I've ever met says. There will have to be compromise for these two to last, and I didn't get any sense they were going to know how to address that need. He begins it by turning down a travel job in order to stay in India for an undisclosed amount of time and says he wants to include her in his dream—and, I think more significantly, his way of life—but I didn't hear her say she was game to join him. I raise this as a critique not because it's unique to this film but because the characters themselves are so cognizant of how different some of their priorities and preferences in life are. They are both introspective and self-aware and don't seem nearly as likely to be able to fool themselves as other romantic pairs might. Maybe their smarts, building off of their affection, will see them through. I hope so.
- The subtitles translated Kalki yelling at the two boys to stop fighting with "Hey Karan! Arjun!" as "Hey Beavis! Butthead!" Heh. Heh heh.
Comments
It is the best thing and you put it so well. However, Deepika Padukone's wooden performance did nothing to convince me that she's an introvert. She just dialled down the volume a little. This role would really have come alive with a more capable performer, like Ayesha Takia, for example.
And wife and I agreed that it was pleasant to see there were no last minute shenanigans during the wedding and it went through perfectly well. That felt like both the characters had matured and not regressed to their 20's.
Me too! She reminds me very much of Hema Malini, so I am always surprised to see that she can actually act! And I do think she is improving as an actor.
I watched this yesterday with a bunch of friends and it was funny how opinions were divided along gender lines - the guys all thought the movie was awful and the women were all drooling over Ranbir! :D
1) "Beware the Beard of NRI Discontent: Ranbir's Parisian facial hair is seriously awful, but it suits the sense of "something is not quite right" when he is most disconnected from heart and metaphorical home."
2) "The character of Lara—hot, dumb, and infantile—feels like an exploitation trick (or gambit, to be generous) of including something mockable in order to get the double payoff of both titillating by showing it and earning brownie points for critiquing it. Maybe she's there as a signifier of the not-fully-matured mind of the hero in his 20s, but she did not sit well in a film that I otherwise found to be more thoughtful and subtle than I was expecting."
Also, I finally (since I'm between jobs and have some free time) took some time to write down my thoughts on YJHD and wanted to share them with you. Once I wrote them and read your post, I was amused by some of the overlap in our thoughts. Mine can be found here...
http://orangelenses.blogspot.ca/2013/06/association-with-karan-johar-by-default.html
Amey - I don't think we had subs on any of the songs? This really was a more mature film in some ways - or at least it depicted more mature lead characters. That's a benefit of jumping the story forward, isn't it? You can still have the zany antics at 23 but then can be more dramatic at 30. (Though they had some nice exchanges in the younger phase too, which helped it all seem consistent.)
Maya - Sorry to hear that! I gather you are not alone in this opinion, though I have not been reading many reviews.
Bollyviewer - I am surprised the guys weren't sufficiently distracted by Deepika's legs. Certainly plenty of opportunity.
Bogey - I loooved the subtitles. At least they were energetic!
Mansi - Thank you!
Anchal - Oh you will find MANY people who take Bollywood seriously - but thank you. :)
But I loved the songs, especially the lyrics. It's very rare nowadays that lyrics can be simple, rhyme so effortlessly and convey so much.
Thanks a lot for the review Beth, as usual, love to read your take on movie!
Thanks for the review :>