not the official policy of Beth Loves Bollywood

-
...but a great subtitle nonetheless.

Dharmatma, 1975

All of the subtitles in this film look like this. Translucent subtitles might be aesthetically delightful, but they sure are hard to read.

Comments

memsaab said…
Yikes!!! I don't think my subtitles were that...um...subtle! :)
January 02, 2010 11:57 AM
Rum said…
LOLOL a subtitle just for me! Hell yeah though Imtiaz's beard has no sex appeal but a Anil mush is great! Hahaha love Dharmatma!
January 02, 2010 2:27 PM
Shweta Mehrotra Gahlawat said…
Such a risque dialogue/subtitle- maybe they made it translucent in a weird aspiration towards propriety :D
thanks for the chandelier Beth!
January 02, 2010 8:42 PM
Louella said…
Just like yellow-bordered tottaly transparent ones when I was watching CD!I in cinema xD
God, sometimes I think they give subtitles without any care. It's annoying.
January 03, 2010 4:39 AM
Beth Loves Bollywood said…
memsaab - Based on your screen caps in your review, I'd agree! I'm jealous. Mine didn't do songs either.

Rum - YES! That one is just for you! And you will be happy to know that one of the next lines is Farida saying "but it pokes me." Not at the level of all the cock jokes in Janbaaz, but still....

Shweta - Hee! I wish the translucency were only for the saucy lines! And glad you liked the chandelier and weird camera angle :)

Louella - Oh dear! Yellow does not sound helpful!
January 03, 2010 11:16 AM
Anonymous said…
Yes, my subtitles were not translucent, lekin, I also don't remember this fantastic one regarding the man's sex appeal lying in his beard, something we all have long know to be true, hai na?

All the best!
Sita-ji
January 03, 2010 11:17 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the Kapoor family tree

-
Image
For all your Kapoor Khazana reference needs (and beyond), here is a Kapoor family tree. This image is courtesy of Madhu Jain's book The Kapoors: The First Family of Indian Cinema(Penguin Books India, 2005). Click the picture to enlarge to legible size.

The dates and underlining are my own. My notations indicate who is of what generation: double underlines are for Prithviraj's children; single underlines are for their children; dashed lines for their children; etc.

If you'd rather read, the family tree goes like this, color-coded by major branch and with the names you probably recognize in bold:
first and second generations: Prithviraj Kapoor (born 1906) is the father of Raj (Ranbir Raj, born 1924), Shammi (Shamsher Raj, 1931), and Shashi (Balbir Raj, 1938). Prithviraj and his wife Ramsarni (Rama) also had a daughter, Urmi (between Shammi and Shashi), and two children who died, Ravinder and Devinder.Prithviraj has a brother named Trilok Kapoor, who is a film actor too. H…
Read more

because guests are as gods

-
Hey, everyone - hi. This is Beth. I am absolutely fascinated with the question of who is reading this, and my curiosity is further piqued by the growth of the happy little dots on my ClustrMap. Either there is some creative ISPing going on here, or I see people visiting from India, Singapore, Mauritius, South Africa, Europe, South America, Canada, and the US. (Special shout-out to Canada! I'm an honourary Canadian! I love you guys!) Anyway, hello to you all! I don't like how most guestbook thingies on websites seem to work, so instead I invite everyone who stops by to leave a little comment on this post (this will also be linked from the nav bar) and say hi and share why you like or are interested in Bollywood - and what brought you here. Thanks! And don't forget to have a snack before you go - they're on the table over there. Punch, too.
Read more

the Ganguly, Mukherjee, and Samarth family tree

-
Image
This group might boggle the mind even more than the Kapoors—to whom, thanks to Kishore Kumar's countless marriages, they are also connected. In college, I had a giant chart of the English royal family since the early medieval period (history major WHAT WHAT), and this one is no less complex. I don't have the words to express how amazed I am by all of this, the layer upon layer of connections, even though there is nothing new in families staying in the same business across generations or in allying with others in the same field. 
Horrifying corollary: if Rani Mukherjee marries Aditya Chopra, then Uday Chopra and Satyajit Ray will be distantly related. Only by marriage, but still.  Previous family tree projects: the Irani sisters (including Javed Akhtar, Shabana Azmi, and Farah Khan), the Feroz and Sanjay Khans and Roshans (with Mumtaz!),  Satyajit Ray to Mithun Chakraborty (which shows the link to the Kapoors), and the Kapoors (which I need to re-do in a more visually clear an…
Read more