this message brought to you by the Ministry of Really Stupid Ideas: Chori Chori Chupke Chupke
This movie features what is surely one of cinema's top ten plots driven by bad, bad ideas. Many questions are raised, such as:
(Note: thet plot of this movie did actually bother me in some serious ways, but I kept telling myself "It's just a movie, and there is so much you don't understand about the expectations of and pressures on women in this culture," even when Priya says she is incomplete becuase she can't be a mother. Becuase otherwise I would have had to turn it off, and if it were a movie from my own culture, with its own wacked-out concepts about the roles and worth of women, I would have.)
Increasing exposure to Salman Khan has not demystified his appeal for me. I can see how maybe he is a pretty good dancer most of the time. But that's all I can say on his behalf.
And, despite my very positive memory of seeing it on the big screen in 1990, owing entirely to holding hands with Chris Lisak, the second of my seven crushes on boys named Chris, Pretty Woman does not merit any kind of remake, tribute, or similar. It's a bad, morally bankrupt story.
- how on earth does a Hindi film present a character married to saintly Rani Mukherji sleeping with a prostitute? A prostitute played with great glee by Preity Zinta, but still. The surrogate is a fine idea, but 1) be honest about it to everyone and 2) get the doctor's help in order to prevent years of under-the-surface seething, guilt, etc. If anyone knows how this movie was received in India, please let me know.
- why does Preity's item number dress look like a 1991 prom reject, and why is it paired with glitter moon boots?
- why does Salman wear a (p)leather shirt? Not jacket. Shirt. Around the collar of which is worn a tie.
- why does no one notice that Madhu, not Priya, is at the ceremony? And isn't it interesting how the effect of having a stiff shawl over your head makes you look like a Star Wars character?
- does chewing gum really make you look so cheap and young? I'll have to stop.
(Note: thet plot of this movie did actually bother me in some serious ways, but I kept telling myself "It's just a movie, and there is so much you don't understand about the expectations of and pressures on women in this culture," even when Priya says she is incomplete becuase she can't be a mother. Becuase otherwise I would have had to turn it off, and if it were a movie from my own culture, with its own wacked-out concepts about the roles and worth of women, I would have.)
Increasing exposure to Salman Khan has not demystified his appeal for me. I can see how maybe he is a pretty good dancer most of the time. But that's all I can say on his behalf.
And, despite my very positive memory of seeing it on the big screen in 1990, owing entirely to holding hands with Chris Lisak, the second of my seven crushes on boys named Chris, Pretty Woman does not merit any kind of remake, tribute, or similar. It's a bad, morally bankrupt story.
Comments
Salman's appeal, from whatever I understand as a fan,lies in his killer looks and gym-toned body, his devil-may-care attitude both on-screen and off-screen, his boyish charm and an aura of being tough yet vulnerable! The masses just love him!
If you notice, the surrogate mother bit was played out in a foreign soil rather than in India. As if that would allay the anti-surrogate motherhood sentiments at home!
re: CCCC - I am so with you, AFJ. I had been properly warned about the story before I started it, but I was still surprised to see just how oddly the concept was treated - there was absolutely no reason not to have Madhu artificially inseminated, especially since they were in cahoots with a doctor! The plot could still have had all the wackiness about having to pretend that Priya was also pregnant, Priya choosing to save Madhu at the end, etc. - but they could have avoided the very icky idea of a married man sleeping with somebody else and his wife being happy about it. It's gross.
I will say that the main reason I finally watched this movie was to see Preity's cowboy hat, and in that I was not disappointed. Sexy indeed!
****
I agree about the problems of bulk - and by extension, probably, that would include some other physical traits that get in the way of the physicality of enacting of whatever the role is. (For example, I find Dev Anand's hair poof totally distracting since it shows up in films where it doesn't make sense.) And of course some filmmakers seem to be very happy to work within those constraints - surely his Dabangg dance moves ("dance moves") are for a reason in addition to humor.
However, personally I'd take distracting physical traits over distracting voice, facial expressions, etc any day. I can ignore the lumbering walk much more easily than I can someone who never sounds like they're actually in the situation they're supposed to be enacting, or someone who cannot move their face (AHEM KATRINA AHEM).